JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 8, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Carlos Alberto Polania Garrido

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto Negativo De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Jueces de un mismo distrito judicial
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió el expediente de la referencia a la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Cali para que defina cuál de los organismos judiciales involucrados en el conflicto negativo es competente para conocer de la tutela incoada por el accionante contra Cafesalud –EPS-, toda vez que es el superior jerárquico común.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional, en Sala Plena
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. REMITIR el expediente de la referencia a la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Cali, para que defina cual de los organismos judiciales involucrados en el conflicto negativo es competente para conocer de la accion de tutela incoada por Carlos Alberto Polania Garrido contra Cafesalud -EPS-.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.